3 approaches to computer security

Straight from Joanna Rutkowska’s blog site

1) Security by Correctness
2) Security by Isolation
3) Security by Obscurity

The first (correctness) sounds unattainable in its complete form, but new frameworks are an improvement. I.e., memory attacks are more difficult in .NET-compiled code vs in native code. The third item, obscurity, refers to randomness, such as ASLR (randomized base addresses), or executables whose runtimes are obfuscated, randomly and at runtime (huge downside: difficult to debug in the field… as someone who does that sort of thing, that one really resonates).

Item #2, isolation, looks intriguing. We do that to an extent (different low-priv usernames, JVM sandboxing), but virtualization gives us the capacity to do that to a much greater extent. So, one compromised VM won’t affect anything else (well, ideally).

As Bruce Schneier likes to say: “security is hard.” And he should know, being a security guru. There’s no silver bullet, but leveraging the three approaches above, taken together—and with a healthy dose of common sense on the part of the user—yields a more secure operating environment.




Comments are closed.


Learn More

Related Posts: Security, Tech , zero-tolerance rules make zero sense , intuitive risk assessment , evil upgrade demoed via wi-fi , 3 approaches to computer security , assessing the risk of global nuclear annihilation , Linux … in the BIOS , politics, piracy, and corruption , scada (infrastructure system security) totally inadequate … OMG! , BIOS malware in our future , extracting cryptographic keys from memory